SeaweedFS vs ZOT OCI Registry
A side-by-side comparison of SeaweedFS and ZOT OCI Registry — pricing, license, deployment, and where each tool wins.
SeaweedFS
github.com
SeaweedFS is an open source distributed file system supporting WebDAV, S3 API, FUSE mount, HDFS, etc, optimized for lots of small files, and easy to add capacity.
ZOT OCI Registry
zotregistry.dev
A production-ready vendor-neutral OCI-native container image registry.
| Feature | SeaweedFS | ZOT OCI Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Model | Open-source | Open-source |
| License | CC-BY-SA-3.0 | CC-BY-SA-3.0 |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Category | File Transfer - Object Storage & File Servers | File Transfer - Object Storage & File Servers |
| Self-hosted | ✓Yes | ✓Yes |
| Free tier | ✓Yes | ✓Yes |
Pick SeaweedFS if…
- ✓You prefer SeaweedFS's feature set or ecosystem fit.
Pick ZOT OCI Registry if…
- ✓You prefer ZOT OCI Registry's feature set or ecosystem fit.